Rule & Regulation on 29 jan 2011 =P

Plans

1. on 29 jan 2011, 4.30 - 5pm must meet at usj 13 skool
   
2. then every1 will get a lucky number
3. then arrange according number then get rdy to move
   
4. every1 plz bring ur touch n go car.
5. reach sepang then will take take pic lo then makan , after dinner maybe go to for a drink "beer". lolx
   -plan can be change, plz leave ur msg at chat box. jh will handle. =D

Rules and Regulations

• speed limit only 110km..no cutting Queue and "no drift"
• however you can't go slower than 100kmh cause you'll be left out
• every1 will be getting a lucky number.. (folo according number)
• fs n ylo plz be come on time.. (late comer will kena punish dam 9 cham) =D
• every1 have to wear x-dest shirt lo .. of cuz dis is important la.
• no fucking in ccw hse
• leader must ensure all cars are following, at traffic light and tolls.
• no revving more than 4k rpm( in view of environmental issue)
• no "fun" flashing and honking
• no middle fingers flying
• no fucks out of open window to others
• no farting
• compulsory to wear sunglasses en route
• must ahve touch n go card, else go pay cash and get left in the dust
• leader must ensure parking space for all cars
• leader must ensure speed 110>x>100 be kept
• leader must ensure the right way is found
• leader must ensure size below 8"
• no pets allowed
• no longs straighten hair
• no gay
• no les
• no crutches
• no wheelchair
• no ....

- all the rules are agreed by x-dest member.


cars

• fs
• cw
  
• jin
• kel
• marc
• js
• ahloong
• cf
• aaron
  
• jh
  
• ylo
• danny
  
• wh
• cl
  

ENJOY

Random post : X-des' "Sat-Yan" session

Everyone busy "Sat yan-ing"... after yumcha session...

order x-dest shirt

X -dest shirt ..
Member:

double shirt

1. Danny & Audrey - confirm
2. Marcus & Seemun - confirm
3. JH & Ayumi - confirm
4. YLO & "secret GIRL = kylie" - confirm
5. KeLvin & Yvonne - confirm
6. CL & teddy - confirm
7. FS & Jazzie - confirm
8. Chris & Irene - confirm (fs ask)
   

single shirt

1. JS - confirm
2. Andy - (fs ask)
3. CW- (fs ask)
4. Aaron - confirm
5. WH - confirm
6. Jin - confirm
7. CF - confirm
8. Ah loong - confirm
9. Looi - confirm

:any1 want to order extra plz leave ur msg... fs need extra plz tell..

Who on earth?

The movie we have been waiting for!

Unleashed!

Invader from planet Nobulu

Coool Restaurant spotted kekeke...

Yo peeps of x-dest... Restaurant VARGINA is added into our x-dest list this year end. Yes?? :)
Anyway.. it was spotted by my gf around jalan air panas, sentul. We shall seek and try out the food and see how it really taste. Hmm.. Vargina food...

-JM-

Count your lucky stars

"KUALA LUMPUR: Seven people were killed and 39 others injured in a bus accident at Genting Sempah.

The accident, which happened at 7.50pm last night, involved a group from the 4B Youth Movement, Kampung Siong, Kedah, said Selangor traffic chief Supt Che Hussein Omar.

“Seventeen were seriously injured while the remaining 22 suffered minor injuries,” he said.

“Two people were thrown out from the bus.”

He added police were investigating the driver for reckless driving.

The group of 44 had chartered an express bus from Baling for the trip.

It is learnt that the bus driver lost control of the vehicle before it hit the road divider and overturned several times at KM38 of Jalan Genting Sempah, some 300m from the Karak Highway.

The co-driver said he was asleep when the crash happened.

“When I got up, the bus was rolling,” he added. "

-fs- dangerous...count your lucky stars

Double Helix

Tot you said no more posting?

From the very beginning I’ve told you already the argument is on the length of travel, distance, not “near” but you consistently disagree with this. How can we be discussing what is near and far if your definition and mine differs so much? My 180 is created by you when you deemed that I am using perception as definition. Twisted facts. What I am trying to prove in my relativity of near is just to refute your insistence of me saying yes to your question. The conclusion that I made in there which you did not care to notice;

"Therefore my answer to you that day holds no water to supports not your “watevar theory” of the argument we are having now."

Never once did I state that I did not agree with you on that day. And when I did say that I’ve agreed on the “near” of yours, again here you’re implying that I am agree to your statement as a full and bring in a conclusion which suits your own.

You’ve also been using the “near” to build your argument. While rejecting my notion of using range to define “near”, you set upon using perception as a tool of judgement.

The supposed Aaron’s theory which is not his, it’s totally mine and I’ve know of the actuality but for joke purposes did I infer it that way.