X-Destination: October 2010

Saturday, October 30, 2010

Count your lucky stars

"KUALA LUMPUR: Seven people were killed and 39 others injured in a bus accident at Genting Sempah.

The accident, which happened at 7.50pm last night, involved a group from the 4B Youth Movement, Kampung Siong, Kedah, said Selangor traffic chief Supt Che Hussein Omar.

“Seventeen were seriously injured while the remaining 22 suffered minor injuries,” he said.

“Two people were thrown out from the bus.”

He added police were investigating the driver for reckless driving.

The group of 44 had chartered an express bus from Baling for the trip.

It is learnt that the bus driver lost control of the vehicle before it hit the road divider and overturned several times at KM38 of Jalan Genting Sempah, some 300m from the Karak Highway.

The co-driver said he was asleep when the crash happened.

“When I got up, the bus was rolling,” he added. "

-fs- dangerous...count your lucky stars

Friday, October 29, 2010

From the very beginning I’ve told you already the argument is on the length of travel, distance, not “near” but you consistently disagree with this. How can we be discussing what is near and far if your definition and mine differs so much? My 180 is created by you when you deemed that I am using perception as definition. Twisted facts. What I am trying to prove in my relativity of near is just to refute your insistence of me saying yes to your question. The conclusion that I made in there which you did not care to notice;

"Therefore my answer to you that day holds no water to supports not your “watevar theory” of the argument we are having now."

Never once did I state that I did not agree with you on that day. And when I did say that I’ve agreed on the “near” of yours, again here you’re implying that I am agree to your statement as a full and bring in a conclusion which suits your own.

You’ve also been using the “near” to build your argument. While rejecting my notion of using range to define “near”, you set upon using perception as a tool of judgement.

The supposed Aaron’s theory which is not his, it’s totally mine and I’ve know of the actuality but for joke purposes did I infer it that way.

180?

Come yc tonight i would state the facts and the basis of the argument...meet at js hse at 10...in front of an audience we shall see who is right or wrong...

And you just prove me right after so long...

My statement was " Ulu Yam was near, you said it was far, you can disagree with me by saying its far but to me its near so how can you say im wrong when my perception of it is near...that is the basis of the argument, and you yourself in your post have said that you answered my question in relative context, so its okay for you to answer in relative context but when i made the statement in relative context you rejected my statement and claim your right...so tell me now who is the Fuhrer?? and dont forget i made the statement first and you rejected it second...so in conclusion just admit you disagree with my statement and tried to make your argument look right by using aaron's theory which you never realised until he said it, using the 50km mark which was'nt stated before, and finally after seeing what is wrong with your argument turn 180 and say that now you answer in relative context WHERE ELSE my statement was always and will be based on my perception of "near" and the story to which i went ulu yam plays an important part ...so now who is spinning more and more?

"Ok, I did say that Genting was “near” when you asked me the question. However, the answer I gave you, the "yes" I uttered was in a relative context. How so? When I said genting was "near" it doesn't always imply that other nearby area e.g. Ulu Yam is although they maybe physically "near" to each other. The relative "near" answer I gave was because of the nature of the location itself where Genting is "near" to me at the point of question is due to the place being a center for activity where one can be doing all whatsoever activities available legal or otherwise and the definition changes with circumstances (I was bored at that time and needed entertainment)"

Near far wherever you are~

TL;DR ?

“You said it was far, i said it was near to sg long and you said nearer to pahang, then i ask you is genting near? you said yes...so your saying its near and because ulu yam and genting is already near to each other this means that your supporting my theory that its nearirrelevant of the distance already...So now you yourself have already supported my notion of "near" even before you stated the distance, which you didn't on the day of the alleged argument which makes it irrelevant (refer to point 3)”

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you are saying that the argument which I've forgotten of the actual content is, about near Pahang of near Sg. Long then I might as well just be declared the winner because Ulu Yam is definitely located closer to Pahang.(lazy do map to show again, you can’t read maps)

Furthermore I would not argue when it comes to intangible reasoning such as “near” or “far” and thus I did remember mentioning about the distance which you seems to have the term distorted to “near” somewhere in your argument and rendering my point unusable(forcefully) with your standing of “I did not mention”.

Now for the “near”

If we’re to continue this with your so call notion of “near” then I might as well call you Fuhrer Siang because you’re being a dictator in defining the “near” of yours and using it to combat it against my argument.

Ok, I did say that Genting was “near” when you asked me the question. However, the answer I gave you, the "yes" I uttered was in a relative context. How so? When I said genting was "near" it doesn't always imply that other nearby area e.g. Ulu Yam is although they maybe physically "near" to each other. The relative "near" answer I gave was because of the nature of the location itself where Genting is "near" to me at the point of question is due to the place being a center for activity where one can be doing all whatsoever activities available legal or otherwise and the definition changes with circumstances (I was bored at that time and needed entertainment).

To a person like Danny whom is working, were we on that day to call for "yc" would surely define Genting as "far". Why? Because he has to get his arse up to work next day in the morning and would’ve wanted somewhere “near” (near being able to get home by max 1am).

I’ve always joked about going to Kuantan for sunrise viewing before, because for the purpose itself I define the place as being “near” while the rest of you would fark me inside out because the none of you doesn’t share my purpose and see the journey as “far”.

Therefore my answer to you that day holds no water to supports not your “watevar theory” of the argument we are having now.

Sg. Long Kok – Ulu Yam

From Sg. Long to Ulu Yam, using the only logical route to reach would surely pass by any of the routes that I’ve stated before, and thus It only adds to the travelling(add= +) time, thus making the journey further.

RM5,800 to charity.

Lazy post

Like i stated earlier...

1) The argument is totally on the distance of travel because I called on JS to use his "lopek" GPS

to find out the how far is it! Unfortunately it was dead and we couldn't settle it then. By the way, I've travel to Ulu Yam more than twice and I can bring you there using 5 different ways. Why? because I uses it every year to balik kampung, I just forgot about the town name at the time.(A reason at least).

My point

The whole point of the argument was i said IT WAS NEAR! you said it was FAR!...you NEVER said anything about distance...since near and far depends on the user of the term you should realise that with your agreement of my "Near" terms and conditions i already won the argument...Basically this sums up my argument...and im lazy cos you keep saying things which i already stated in the previous post...ah hong ah hong...

You said it was far, i said it was near to sg long and you said nearer to pahang, then i ask you is genting near? you said yes...so your saying its near and because ulu yam and genting is already near to each other this means that your supporting my theory that its near irrelevant of the distance already...So now you yourself have already supported my notion of "near" even before you stated the distance, which you didn't on the day of the alleged argument which makes it irrelevant (refer to point 3)

2) Sg Long is NOT nearer to Ulu Yam, see map for reference.(I got A for geography, wrote my name, IC and address)

Like i said above the term "Near"depends on the users intention and purpose and for all intentions and purposes i have said its near for me...you disagree with my statement....the onus was on you to prove that its not near for me....but how can your argue near and far when the terms does not have the same meaning as to other people? so that's why i asked you the question above which i have highlighted for your reading purposes...when you agree to my questions you were already agreeing to my term of "near"and thus giving me the golden key to rm5800...

3)

The ways are

-Rawang old road

I nearly crashed here due to hydroplaning, lucky I terrer

-NorthSouth expressway

Boring but can speed, if no traffic jam

-batu tua dam/batu cave way

Fucken fun to drive at high speed, like Initial D, if no lorry blocking

-genting way

Fucken far, but a way at the least

3) Your so called argument now revolves around aaron's calculation and the 50km mark (which wasn't stated/implied/made clear at the time of the argument) which has no whatsoever meaning when i ask you a simple question...Have you drove from sg long to ulu yam? like i guess...NO...so who has more experience when talking about this matter? the person who drove there right? and i've driven there more than 2 times for fun...i dont care how many ways you have gone before as long as you havent taken the route from sungai long to ulu yam it doesnt matter whether its from your hse from my hse from aaron's hse not your kampung or whatever place BUT from SG LONG TO ULU YAM!

I already stated everything in my previous post...the maps dont matter because the argument is on term "near" and you are really forgetful....Dont you dare say you didnt agree saying genting was near...I lazy spam d...so i give you one last chance to post one more thing i wont reply cos i know i already won that day, that why i didnt say anything more about it...if you cannot argue on the said "term" which you already agreed on that day then better dont post already...and for the record pls answer me whether you honestly agreed whether genting was near in your next post...save me time as its the whole main point of the argument...and if you said no...then ah hong you really purposely forget lor...XD

-fs- singing money money money...

SusuSusuSg Looong kat mana?

NO! Vader! Why! We Had Such Good Times Together!

anyway, back to topic again..and again..and...

1) I never said Ulu Yam wasn't in Selangor, never once did I mentioned it was in Pahang either. I said its not in KL, rather further than KL is what I specifically said. Time twist facts.

2) Sg Long is NOT nearer to Ulu Yam, see map for reference.(I got A for geography, wrote my name, IC and address)

3) The argument is totally on the distance of travel because I called on JS to use his "lopek" GPS

The ways are

-Rawang old road

I nearly crashed here due to hydroplaning, lucky I terrer

-NorthSouth expressway

Boring but can speed, if no traffic jam

-batu tua dam/batu cave way

Fucken fun to drive at high speed, like Initial D, if no lorry blocking

-genting way

Fucken far, but a way at the least

-my way~

no comment yet-

nearer eh from Sg. long? er... yeah, nearer...near..

Some trivia for you guys whom doesn't care.

here comes my free holiday~~

Free 5.8k...

As you said it was in Pahang...i said it was near sg long which in selangor and Ulu yam IS IN SELANGOR!...according to aaron theory your counting from usj? and you didnt state the 50km mark so it is irrelevant...we go according to what we state that day...

The main points which you fail to state in your argument!

1) You said it was far, i said it was near to sg long and you said nearer to pahang, then i ask you is genting near? you said yes...so your saying its near and because ulu yam and genting is already near to each other this means that your supporting my theory that its near irrelevant of the distance already...So now you yourself have already supported my notion of "near" even before you stated the distance, which you didn't on the day of the alleged argument which makes it irrelevant (refer to point 3)

2) Your the one who said that it was in PAHANG, i stated NO! its nearer and for you information its in SELANGOR...look it up...and you just told Andy that selangor was in kuala lumpur...(anyone who doesnt believe can ask andy and js as my witness) so how can you get A for your geography? i seriously doubt the capability of the teacher that marks your paper and gave you an A for if that is the case even if i wrote my name i would get an -A...

3) Your so called argument now revolves around aaron's calculation and the 50km mark (which wasn't stated/implied/made clear at the time of the argument) which has no whatsoever meaning when i ask you a simple question...Have you drove from sg long to ulu yam? like i guess...NO...so who has more experience when talking about this matter? the person who drove there right? and i've driven there more than 2 times for fun...i dont care how many ways you have gone before as long as you havent taken the route from sungai long to ulu yam it doesnt matter whether its from your hse from my hse from aaron's hse not your kampung or whatever place BUT from SG LONG TO ULU YAM!

So a few pictures for you too...

one finger only ? here's two!! (courtesy of stone cold)